It is certainly the fastest way to send a company to fry. It is said that the third generation and that which destroys it. Let's analyze why happens in big corporations that should be protected more small and medium-sized companies where management sendo more direct impact on several decisions.

 

There is no need for direct intervention in decision-making, is just be there somewhere to stumble across the mechanism for management. The mechanisms of authority via hierarchy are upset, the mechanisms of authority via consent are upset, the mechanisms of authority via knowledge are finished.

 

Just say to the shareholder said that because the doubts s'istallino, the malicious n'approfittino to get their ideas, and what is worse, and that so slowly that says that the shareholder or have stated that said the shareholder become the Cazzate that finally make the desconfianza between troops installing, you lose team spirit, confidence in that there is a management capable el'azienda becomes a joke.

 

But should not always happen so, whether the inclusion in company structure and did so with intelligence. For intelligence mean that a career is made and executed with a guardian of this can be fatal, can be beneficial. But when and done only for walking and when the legend becomes a boomerang against it. When you are abroad, more for fun or learning a language that working, going to work with because skateboarding and fashion, or do a lap in state at the factory or assigned tasks as ill-defined role and / or insertion in structure in positions that have a direct impact in the lives of the company, without any more experience with them is to shade him a hand in decisions, revise or stimulate the disaster and served.

 

The company becomes a more sympathetic for toys that the shareholder. It is creating tensions at the top of the structure if the placement is not in the top because the moral weight of an opinion worth more than the view of another manager, in low because workers do not understand anything and threaten the position of work they have finally at the same level as the specific weight of the shareholder and largest of the views of those who have earned the job.

 

However, so far the damage can be contained if the decisions do not have a strong impact outside the company if customers or prospective customers perceive and connect the work of the shareholder with the results of its decisions. We always talk about the case in negative, because clearly if the level of the couple action / outcome has consequences because we are good on strategic, high management decisions, the results can be fair, and there America teaches us much if we take for Ford example. A step by step, no game, no raggazzonate, a career that leads to professional maturity.

 

Here you play, and becomes a protagonist both programs petegoleze well as those of satire, but never interviewed by large generalists or economic netwoork to discuss strategy.

 

And in these cases the question and always the same, but his guilt or those who put in that position? You will see him in the chapter.

 

But so difficult? No, should not have all the means available so why not, when a large and surrounded by men, knows from small to large men, something has to stick. One must not concern other than learning to live and govern.