Nefarious! Nefarious! Nefarious! The market today and so complex and so competitive that the slightest distraction you thrown out. Today, a company must be the most competitive, it must be concentrated at its maximum around and devote its resources to ensure future growth. And can not slow down the investment because the profit generated is addressed to other companies is a form of overt or with discharges of intra for inefficient services, masking the true efficiency of the company.

 

The famous "does not matter, the pockets are different, but the pants are the same as" not true. Not the case because doing so would risk losing the pants or that he be shorter each time. Why? Because in many cases, the transfer prices are artificial and not based on a market price. The market price requires you to be efficient, the price artificially to live holgadamente jeopardizing your internal customer, distracting resources essential for its growth.

 

Every company needs to be efficient, you can not create artificial value. Yes, you can do short, but medium-term survival of the core business will suffer and will be sentenced. This time the condition of derivererà Marcato, clearly expansive in situations that may be vitiated circle while this cycle lasts, but will fall quickly as the cycle turning into recession. The vicious spin that resources are going to increase the profit of associates instead of being reinvested in more efficient or create new products or R & D to ensure the future leads that the company is no longer ready to act, that the time for act because it allunghino there are new products or byproducts and all ports to the circle of defeat, less sales, fewer resources to support sales, R & D less and less new products and less sales, loss ...

 

But this vision Inexpensive is not the worst. Many times in business we look to the economic results, but often do not look at the engine of any company, its management. My belief and Cecca. I believe blindly that a management motivated and able to meet even the worst moments and can get out. I think that companies are made up of men and these are those that determine the long-term success, rather than when they are sentenced to their cycles or market. The man does not suffer any cycle, and he consistently does not depend on the market, does not depend de himself (Excluding diseases), depends on one thing: motivation! Motivate management and will be effective for long.

 

Back to say that is not the worst. The worst and where the lack of transparency and lack of defining the strategic import. When you do not say clearly, we must now help this company or that other strategically because we agree or because there is a clear design, and allow management to the motivation grows.

 

The permanently squeezed able to get results while other managers enjoy the book without any real contribution fosters motivation and the "left". We're talking about cases where clearly the non-core holdings are not efficient or do not provide services to the core company in market conditions. The case, namely that companies do not work in core prices or markets in terms of market efficiency, could not be that aid and bearing a multiplier effect in the grounds because the results could not only be positive and your responsibilities increase because you would be aware that other companies are working to get the best possible conditions for success. And you yourself would be crucial for the rest of your holdings and their success, the virtuous circle. But here we talk about what should be done to send to the company whores.

 

Create this whole array of subsidiaries and positive control all the business generated around a product and positive, extract the maximum and not let others take advantage of your product and positive. And what negative and do so without a proper check on the conditions in which the services or products are offered. What is negative and not compartir with management operating the business strategy for which it acts in one form or another.

 

In large organizations that control and difficult, the possibility to hide or "maquillare" the data are immense. If there is no direction or independent committee to monitor the efficiency of each subsidiary and the risk that each one tends to gain the maximum on the shoulders of others, generates only a notional benefit society in some short, but that is only that these hours profitable companies will evolve into inefficient because they have lost the comparison with the market, and when someone will wake up and ask services market the trauma will be so strong as not recovered.

 

The easy money and too great a temptation within large companies, apply to transfer pricing for products or services higher or less efficient than those of other directions to the market only creates inefficiencies in the direction because generating and falls asleep in what they receive because its difficulty to transform these by-products and services to suit the market and more and more difficult to market, more difficult to obtain results, sometimes having to generate additional costs for marketing through promotions, communications exceeding those would be necessary to introduce the product. And only a generation of inefficiencies.

 

In recent years we worry so much of  control of the company's accounting system and monitoring of ethical management, but today there are large holdings in a direction that will assess these transfer pricing or not to leave importance to efficiency services. I am not talking about price between matrix and affiliates that well controls the Finance Directorate, or control of companies in the group that manages the Finance Directorate. I refer to the Financial Management does not analyze that these prices are actually Market or to the more convenient because there is a strategy. The Financial Management does not analyze which are efficient services paid, which analyzes not work efficiently. Does not it also the directions purchases usually more oriented to the purchase of products and services where and more difficult to assess the efficiency or price. The Directorate purchases and usually more focused on value not on the service. Many times these contracts are beyond its intra-trading of Acuista, concentrated in the product itself and not with the services or products generated by its product. It leaves the internal power struggle between Top Managers to try to get better or worse less, but the result of a relationship of power, not a joint action to be all more efficient.

 

Masking efficiency and too easy because there is a supervisory body. Using surveys show an efficiency or another and so easy that there must be a common objective. Have a body to monitor the effectiveness of these products or services must add the shareholder value. The syndrome D. The so called because