Meeting the first level to approve a strategic project after months of the spring pulls on the details of who does what, how to do it, where do, where everyone is not always agree regardless of his position, sometimes not convinced the director, wrapped and marketing, other times the commercial, sometimes support functions, but after months it comes to meeting final approval.

 

The managing director, after a long debate with all the functions of the first and second level after that everyone has their opinions spressato the support or matizazione pero detail without ever issue a "niet" to the project, turn right and asks one of its first two levels must take the project forward, you agree? Why are you that you must continue, all other students will receive support? Do you agree? Dry Answer: yes. It turns to his left, his second first level that should continue the initiative and made the application, well you agree to run it? This is a big step, you agree? Answer less dry: yes, I agree and important, we need to adjust something… pero si. Looking to the rest of managers around the table both support functions that operational now to work and help these two gentlemen who were compromises to pursue the project, because it is they who must sell it and do it! Do you agree, eh? Yes, yes, all satisfaction, rice after a long process of carrying out a project so ambitious. All encompassing, interchange of views, relaxation, convinced to go ahead. Everyone, not despite the tough moments passed to advance the project, with the reluctance of each other and with involvement in various different stages?

 

In a normal company, where no one lives in a Democratic Republic, but where there is a hierarchy, the normal outcome of a meeting of this type must forcibly transformed into actions, work hard to achieve the expected results of a strategic project. That in a normal company, but where we are wanting to send puttane the company, there is no better result than to return every one to question the decision taken, and that there is no consequence.

 

This and another standard for effective puttane to send a company, to promote a republic where every one must decide what to do, it would be more correct to speak of Anarchy, but the word seems a little distant, I would prefer that the Democratic Republic where he acts on votes, and not always so in all countries. because these votes are "dancers". But will we go in another category.

 

A Top Manager can encourage that decisions are taken as a team to promote motivation, promote the struggle for a goal, encourage that decisions are not a job, but a machine in which each one contributes with his experience. This is very European, but ineffective, because the risk that is taken for "lascicita" and that encourages every one face after what he wants and too risky. We talk about work in teams and in any proposals for work and this ability to work in a team that prevails, low important assesment and dedicated to this feature, but the reality and that we are not capable. We are not able to listen, occasionally taking a step back and let someone or some idea forward and share it even if it is not ours. We are not able to stay silent and listen to what they say colleagues or those who work with us, it seems that only we know everything.

 

In fact, with our colleagues and our employees as we behave Monarchy, when at the same time we must submit to a CEO, we behave of the Republic. We want to decide us, we can do, be able to challenge its decision, to act as we want.

 

So a company does not work, the only thing that you and destroy value because the targets are no longer common, there is no transfer of ideas, not working in the same direction. A certain amount of discretion, the opportunity to bring ideas, participate in strategic decisions miss more than there were at these levels, but later, we must work in one sense, with a unique strength of attack. It destroys the medium-term operation because each arm and leg of trying to move independently, and to experience physical, we know that if there is no coordination between our bodies engines, we will not forward it back.

 

The most effective organizations are those that behave as a monarchy, let us say no absolutist, but monarchy however, where there is a strong CEO, who will receive advice but who decides and which judgement and no appeal, as well as its decisions. There is another body to which they can appeal, what it involves judges sometimes wrong or errors over time. There is only a shareholder upon him, to him their confidence and he manages and order. Thus the company and safe to go in a single direction, sometimes even wrong, but sure that if deva replace the Top Manager because the results arriving consequence that the direction was actually wrong, you can be sure that the structure that troops are allenate as a single army prepared to give battle without fisure without several fields, without motivation, without "lascismo."

 

Let lassitudine too, even in good faith to motivate your people, and you get a boat without direction.

 

It could be the syndrome dell'olivo.