In large organization and sometimes complex pressure falls into step by step without ensuring that the step following that direct contact receives the same pressure. Often, we use the metaphors of a cascade of water in several staircases, the quantity of water and power is not the same at the end of that commencement, when natural law the amount of water and power should be the same.

 

The Top management is so busy sending water down the cascade that dedicates not enough time to ensure that this water arrives at all levels. One could say that the important are the results, which finally arrives water in the ocean. But this is not the question. The question is: came across the water as possible? came with enough force? It has lost to the river? Why? How riparar Me?

 

The other set of questions are: why deal with lower levels if all are professionals and pass the information? The problem is that not all are equal and we understand the same, the problem is that often the information is a voice and unwritten, the problem is that they are issued in multiple meetings in which most of the time there is a record, the problem is that these meetings are long and one no longer remembers what is said at the outset, the problem is that we are after the interests of personal growth, the problem is that there are more interest because quel'altro has not success, the problem is that we are managers "human beens."

 

Being human beens is not just computers have the difficulty to forward information in the same amount, in the same words and with the same impetus / pressure from one level to another. And the degree of experience varies down to levels and consequently it will vary the quantity, quality and pressure information.

 

This is not manual methodology, but the easiest thing is that all information that deva be forwarded it is in writing. Today companies have intranet or Internet. Write a text is simple, forward ideas to writing too. Few words and clear assures us that the message is the same throughout the chain.

 

To which I want to signal the importance of supervision, not what to do, but how to behave. Today is not enough to have a direct relationship between a level and another. Today, we skip this hierarchy to ensure that there is the same level of information and pressure. It does not mean disautorizzare the level immediately below, means bear and ensure that the company works in full revolutions. Today we are too strategy, moving on plans for the tactic, to verify the results, but we do not know how the soldiers or marshals interpret everything and how it run.

 

In the past the generals, they could see the entire field of battle and understand how his orders were executed, the results in real time and act changing tactics. Today is no longer possible in a global marketplace and complex. We are completely Czechs on what actually happens beyond words, we ricolleghiamo in Chapter farse recount numbers. We need to know how the second management works, even the third. Without knowing how is the feeling, as interpret things to do, how do we have an efficient company that works to reach its full potential, at most have a company from the results, and at worst a company to which comes to work at a time and if it comes to another.

 

The more negative confluence of circumstances, circumstances or internal market already told in different chapters, a form of saving the company to send puttane and know what it happens at all levels to intentar address the situation. Let us not forget that companies are not made of strategies, but of men who apply the tactics and execute a working knowledge of how people is basic. The leadership should not be only to immediately lower levels, but at all levels lower. You can have a strong leadership on a first level that is unable to operate the same to its respective level. So the whole effect is lost. The leadership should be measured in concentric circles that aggruppano all lower levels, so yes you can get brilliant results. And not only those business, but also those of distribution in any case is one. Companies tend to forget the existence of the distribution, reference to chapter.

 

How many times we find ourselves with managers closed its offices leaving only to close in meeting rooms! The manager must leave, must know, must be sure that was interpreted correctly and the organization of men below.