



The manager who wants to create value for the shareholder and which claims only professional growth characterizes yes because the first thing he does it and erase the past or say that everything that made the first were made cazzate evil.
In books management company says the first listen to the market, after listening your team and finally decide. The reality many times and that no one listens to the Market, feels the team (listen must have the value that one and willing to
absorb what they hear, feel and instead only be in front of a face with of listening), and finally changes everything, even if there were results.
The ill-manager believes that only by changing the shareholder will that has done something, after if things vain evil always there will be some explanation, juncture, other departments ... the important and show that things are inversely or for different people.
By doing so only destroys, unfortunately for Schopenhauer, is not a distruggione to create something better. There are those who think that always we can From that fact to construct, perhaps it should be destroyed somewhere, but not the
all. And easier because there is already un'inerzia, costs less than redo everything,results arrive faster. Instead these things that seem common sense, Businesses in unstructured, those Latin normally, what are ordinary.
That slows down the process of decision, the management managed not moved more and burn resources of the shareholder. And there I turn to the chapter to whom and the fault, to him or who has them. A company like read and un'interrelazione constant, fragile that to be effective it is necessary that the maximum "issues" functions.
Take the case of a new Top Manager arrives and the first thing he does and bring his men, both enterprise-wide od'affiliata should be. Nefasto for the motivation of those who have worked. Nefasto because they know that will last as long that will last the top management and collaboration is limited to minimum essential in hopes of a new manager or take advantage of this opportunity to connecting with the shoes and be able to ascend, which happens rarely. Nefasto but happens often, the elephant in the crystal, and after all roto rarely manages to rebuild. This first form of change management, if Combined and change take all actions implemented or implementations cause el'insuccesso paralysis, only justified because not having to change everything and could focus in the strategy and actions to gain. Too easy! But there until the destruction of value for the shareholder and low. It elevates because after this period that normally carries six months of loss, begin to implement new policies, because as everything and reported, surely this manager will not have analysed the past and because of results, less concerned will be listened to the market, and at that point his Shares may not only be disastrous both in time and for the future survival.
I call him the syndrome of chicken!survival.
I call him the syndrome of chicken!